CO129-487 - Others & Individuals - 1924 — Page 558

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

#13 Zotzet i

The resentment among the masses of the Chinese populations of their territories would create very serious and (in views of the Governor) insoluble problems for the Governments concerned;

but also that the adoption of this policy would not carry us a single step further towards the ultimate total suppression of opium smoking, which is one of the main objects of the Opium Convention signed at The Hague in 1912.

The only article in the Convention which (it is alleged) is not being carried out in the Far Eastern Colonies reads as follows: –

"The contracting Powers shall take measures for the gradual and effective suppression of the manufacture of, internal trade in, and use of prepared opium, with due regard to the varying circumstances of each country concerned."

Briefly, my view is that (1) the policy advocated by the Home Office does not pay that regard for the local circumstances of the Far Eastern Colonies and Protectorates which is contemplated by the Convention; (2) it is in direct opposition to the very strongly expressed views of the Governors, who have been assisted in arriving at their conclusions by the Reports...

Page 449

Edit History

2026-06-27 02:34:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

#13 Zotzet iThe resentment among the masses of the Chinese populations of their territories would create very serious and (in views of the Governor) insoluble problems for the Governments concerned;but also that the adoption of this policy would not carry us a single step further towards the ultimate total suppression of opium smoking, which is one of the main objects of the Opium Convention signed at The Hague in 1912.The only article in the Convention which (it is alleged) is not being carried out in the Far Eastern Colonies reads as follows: –"The contracting Powers shall take measures for the gradual and effective suppression of the manufacture of, internal trade in, and use of prepared opium, with due regard to the varying circumstances of each country concerned."Briefly, my view is that (1) the policy advocated by the Home Office does not pay that regard for the local circumstances of the Far Eastern Colonies and Protectorates which is contemplated by the Convention; (2) it is in direct opposition to the very strongly expressed views of the Governors, who have been assisted in arriving at their conclusions by the Reports...Page 449

Baseline (Original)

.TUFQUE547£#13 Zotzet iZAKOQOTC mid ni tUBITOOJej troetsbred .tk·GATE THY stad bipowad 2seldom w zal griaunsonBobs ad ea quiing adidmusavat mi sonatui nuvaatia nk BØRNIM DT4+LEzلاميات resentment mong the masses of the Chinese populations of their territoriesand would create very serious and (in views of the Governeray) insoluble problems for the Governments concerned;but also that the adoption of this policy would not carry us a single step further towards the ultimate total suppression of opium smoking which is one of the mein objects of the Opium Convention signed at the Hague in 1912.The only article in the Convention which (it is alleged) is not being carried out in the Far Eastern Colonies Tesde as follows: –"The contracting Powers shall take measures for the gradual and effective suppression of the manufacture of, internal Trade in, and use of prepared opium, with the regard to the varying circumstances of each countw concerned.5. Briefly my view is that (1) the policy advocated by the Home Office does not pay that regard for the local circumstances of the Far Eastern Colonies, and Protectorates which is contemplated by the Gonvention; (2) Át is in direct opposition to the very strongly expressed views of the Governors, who have been assisted in arriving at their conclusions by the 449Reports

2026-06-27 02:34:51 · Baseline

View content

.TUFQUE

547

£ #13 Zotzet i

ZAKOQOTC mid ni tUBITOO

Jej troetsbred .tk

GATE THY stad bipo

wad 2

seldom w zal griaunson

Bobs ad ea quiing adid

musavat mi sonatui nu

vaatia nk BØRNIM DT4

لاميات

resentment mong the masses of the Chinese populations of their territories and would create very serious and (in views of the Governeray) insoluble problems for the Governments concerned;

but also that the adoption of this policy would not carry us a single step further towards the ultimate

total suppression of opium smoking which

is one of the mein objects of the Opium Convention signed at the Hague in

1912.

The only article in the Convention which (it is alleged) is not being carried out in the Far

Eastern Colonies Tesde as follows: –

"The contracting Powers shall

take measures for the gradual and effective suppression of the manufacture of, internal Trade in, and use of prepared opium, with the regard to the varying circumstances of each

countw concerned.

5. Briefly my view is that (1) the policy advocated by the Home Office does not pay that regard for the local circumstances of the Far Eastern

Colonies, and Protectorates

which

is contemplated by the Gonvention; (2) Át is in direct opposition to the

very strongly expressed views of the Governors, who have been assisted in arriving at their conclusions by the

CO129-487 - Others & Individuals - 1924 — Page 558

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note